[RUME] Instrument to Assess General Scientific Understanding

Richard Hake rrhake at earthlink.net
Thu Sep 25 19:36:52 EDT 2008


If you reply to this long (6 kB) post please don't hit the reply 
button unless you prune the copy of this post that may appear in your 
reply down to a few relevant lines, otherwise the entire already 
archived post may be needlessly resent to subscribers.

"John" (2008), in his EvalTalk post titled "Instrument to Assess 
General Scientific Understanding" wrote [bracketed by lines "JJJJJJJJ 
. . . . . ."]

JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ
I am looking for an instrument designed to assess general scientific 
understanding of college freshmen who have completed a one year 
sequence in biology, chemistry, or physics.

I realize this is a very vague description, but this is preliminary 
research so am casting a very broad net. In addition to an actual 
instrument, references, articles, etc to help me get oriented will be 
greatly appreciated. BTW, I am well versed in psychometrics and 
measurement so am in less need of assistance in those areas.
JJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ

To which Sam Held (2008) replied:

". . . . . Plenty of tests are available out there but I think to 
cast the big net, you may want to look at concept inventories. . .  ."

For an inventory of Concept Inventories see "Formative Pre/post Tests 
For Various Disciplines" [Hake (2008a)].  The abstract reads:

*******************************************
ABSTRACT: I give references to: (I) well-known early concept 
inventories; (II) formative pre/post diagnostic tests for Astronomy, 
Economics, Biology, Biomechanics, Calculus, Chemistry, Geoscience, 
Statistics, Statics, and Engineering (Circuits, Computer Engineering, 
Dynamics, Electromagnetics, Electronics, Fluid Mechanics, Heat 
Transfer, Materials, Signals and Systems, Strength of Materials, 
Thermodynamics, and Waves) ); and  (III) seven reviews that discuss 
pre/post testing. 
*******************************************

Regarding III above (seven reviews that discuss pre/post testing), 
most concept inventories are designed to be used in formative 
pre/post testing to gauge the relative effectiveness of courses in 
promoting higher-order student learning.  In my opinion, their use as 
only  posttests would be of limited value.

Richard Hake, Emeritus Professor of Physics, Indiana University
24245 Hatteras Street, Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Honorary Member, Curmudgeon Lodge of  Deventer, The Netherlands.
< rrhake at earthlink.net >
< http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~hake/ >
< http://www.physics.indiana.edu/~sdi/ >

REFERENCES [Tiny URL's courtesy < http://tinyurl.com/create.php >.]
"John." 2008. "Instrument to Assess General Scientific 
Understanding," EvalTalk post of 22 Sep 2008 06:05:39-0700; online at
< http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0809d&L=evaltalk&D=1&T=0&P=165 >.

Hake, R.R. 2008a. "Formative Pre/post Tests For Various Disciplines," 
online as it appears on the OPEN! AERA-D archives at < 
http://tinyurl.com/6cyemf > where URL's in my post are properly 
HOT-LINKED (unlike those on EdResMeth, EdStat, EvalTalk, and POD). 
Post of 7 and 8 July to AERA-D, ASSESS, Biopi-L, Chemed-L, DrEd, 
EdResMeth, EdStat, EvalTalk, IFETS, Net-Gold, PhysLrnR, POD, RUME,  & 
WBTOLL-L.

Hake, R.R. 2008b. "Re: Formative Pre/post Tests For Various 
Disciplines," online on the OPEN! AERA-D archives at < 
http://tinyurl.com/3jcmsl >. Post of 9 Jul 2008 14:12:18 -0700 to 
AERA-D, Chemed-L, EvalTalk, Phys-L, PhysLrnR, and POD.

Held, S. 2008. "Re: Instrument to Assess General Scientific 
Understanding," EvalTalk post of 22 Sep 2008 14:10:06-0400; online at
  < http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0809d&L=evaltalk&D=1&T=0&P=1158 >.





More information about the Rume mailing list